Linking biomimetic binding measurements to pharmacokinetic models of volume of distribution and hepatic clearance

Review paper

Authors

  • Klara Livia Valko Bio-Mimetic Chromatography, Ltd. Business &Technology Centre, Bessemer Drive, Stevenage, Herts. SG1 2DX United Kingdom https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4605-2941

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.3311

Keywords:

Non-specific binding, pharmacokinetics, tissue binding, plasma protein binding, biomimetic chromatography

Abstract

Background and purpose: The steady-state volume of distribution reflects the extent to which drugs partition between plasma and tissues and is closely related to the tissue-to-plasma partition coefficient. In pharmacokinetics, different modelling frameworks have led to ongoing debate regarding the role of plasma protein binding and the importance of unbound drug exposure in determining both distribution and clearance. This review aims to clarify the relationship between distribution and elimination models and to assess how experimental binding measurements can support their mechanistic interpretation. Experimental approach: Established pharmacokinetic relationships linking volume of distribution (Vd), clearance and half-life were analysed alongside biomimetic chromatographic measurements of drug binding to human serum albumin and phospholipid membranes using immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) chromatography. Literature data for marketed drugs were evaluated to examine how these experimental descriptors relate to distribution and clearance behaviour. Key results: The analysis shows that distribution and clearance models describe complementary aspects of drug disposition rather than contradictory processes. Tissue binding, as reflected by phospholipid affinity measured by IAM chromatography, plays a dominant role in determining Vd, while plasma protein binding influences both distribution and clearance through its effect on the fraction of drug unbound in plasma. The apparent paradox of plasma protein binding arises because changes in unbound fraction affect both processes simultaneously. Conclusion: This work demonstrates that biomimetic binding measurements provide a mechanistically meaningful bridge between physicochemical properties and pharmacokinetic behaviour. By integrating experimental binding data with pharmacokinetic models, the study advances understanding of how distribution and clearance are linked, supporting more informed decision-making in early drug discovery while highlighting that clearance remains influenced by additional factors beyond non-specific binding.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

olm, T.N. Tozer. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: concepts and applications. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott William & Wilkins, 2011. ISBN 978-0781750097

[2] M. Gibaldi, D. Perrie. Pharmacokinetics 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, New York, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1201/b14095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/b14095

[3] P. Poulin, F.P. Theil. Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies. II. Generic physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of drug disposition. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 91(5) (2002) 1358-1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.10128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.10128

[4] A. Rane, G.R. Wilkinson, D.G. Shand. Prediction of hepatic extraction ratio from in vitro measurement of intrinsic clearance. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 200(2) (1977) 420-424. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/839445/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3565(25)30786-X

[5] D. A. Smith, L. Di, E.H. Kerns. The free drug hypothesis: key concepts in drug discovery. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9 (2010) 929-939. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3287

[6] Goodman & Gilman's: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 14th Edition. L.L. Brunton, B.C. Knollmann, Eds., McGraw-Hill Education; 2023. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?bookid=3191&sectionid=265824603

[7] K. Valko. Application of biomimetic HPLC to estimate in vivo behavior of early drug discovery compounds. Future Drug Discovery 1(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.4155/fdd-2019-0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4155/fdd-2019-0004

[8] K.L. Valko. Biomimetic chromatography-A novel application of the chromatographic principles. Analytical Science Advances 3 (2022) 146-153. https://doi.org/10.1002/ansa.202200004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ansa.202200004

[9] K.L. Valkó, S.B. Nunhuck, A.P. Hill. Estimating Unbound Volume of Distribution and Tissue Binding by in vitro HPLC-based Human Serum Albumin and Immobilized Artificial Membrane-Binding Measurements. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 100 (2011) 849-862. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22323 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.22323

[10] F. Hollosy, K. Valko, A. Hersey, S. Nunhuck, G. Keri, C. Bevan. Estimation of Volume of Distribution in Humans from HPLC Measurements of Human Serum Albumin Binding and Immobilized Artificial Membrane Partitioning. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 49 (2006) 6958-6971. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm050957i DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jm050957i

[11] K. Valko, E. Chiarparin, S. Nunhuck, D. Montanari. In vitro measurement of drug efficiency index to aid early lead optimization. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 101 (2012) 4155-4169. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23305 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23305

Downloads

Published

29-04-2026

Issue

Section

Medicinal chemistry

How to Cite

Linking biomimetic binding measurements to pharmacokinetic models of volume of distribution and hepatic clearance: Review paper. (2026). ADMET and DMPK, 14, Article 3311. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.3311

Most read articles by the same author(s)