Effect of immersion time at the stainless steel 304L/NaCl (0.01 M) interface

Authors

  • Wejdene Mastouri Institut Pprime, Université de Poitiers-CNRS-ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers
  • Luc Pichon Institut Pprime, Université de Poitiers-CNRS-ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers
  • Serguei Martemianov Institut Pprime, Université de Poitiers-CNRS-ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers
  • Thierry Paillat Institut Pprime, Université de Poitiers-CNRS-ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers
  • Anthony Thomas Institut Pprime, Université de Poitiers-CNRS-ENSMA, UPR 3346, Poitiers http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-8043

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.639

Keywords:

Stainless steel 304L, Low concentration NaCl aqueous solution (0.01 M), Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy, Immersion time

Abstract

Stainless steels are broadly used thanks to their specific physical properties such as their high corrosion resistance in poorly aggressive solutions. However, only few studies have been reported in the literature concerning their electrochemical behavior in low concentration electrolytes medium. Accordingly, the present work aims to study the immersion time influence on the solid-liquid interface properties of the austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L, immersed in a low-concentrated (0.01 M) sodium chloride (NaCl) solution. The electroche­mical behavior of the interface was evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and open circuit potential (OCP) monitoring. The morphological features and the modification of the surface composition were evaluated by Optic Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscopy, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometry, Atomic Force Microscopy, White Light Interferometry and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. It was determined by OCP measurement that the characteristic time of the interface stabilization is very long (several months). After an immersion of 2 months in NaCl solution, a second time constant on impedance phase diagram appears. Surface characterizations reveal a significant modifi­cation of the morphology and chemistry of the AISI 304L surface that can be linked to OCP/EIS observations. It can be noticed that the repeatability deviation of the EIS method was about 1 % while its reproducibility deviation was estimated to 35 %.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Ibrahim, S. S. Abd El Rehim, M. M. Hamza, Materials Chemistry and Physics 115 (2009) 80-85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2008.11.016

L. J. Oblonsky, M. P. Ryan, H. S. Isaacs, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 145 (1998) 1922-1932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1838577

C. Olsson, D. Landolt, Electrochimica Acta 48 (2003) 1093-1104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00841-1

L. Hamadou, A. Kadri, N. Benbrahim, Applied Surface Science 252 (2005) 1510-1519 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.02.135

M. Mohammadi, L. Choudhary, I. M. Gadala, A. Alfantazi, Journal of the Electrochemical Society 163 (2016) C883-C894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0841614jes

L. Freire, M. J. Carmezim, M. G. S. Ferreira, M. F. Montemor, Electrochimica Acta 56 (2011) 5280-5289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.094

S. Fajardo, D. M. Bastidas, M. Criado, J. M. Bastidas, Electrochimica Acta 129 (2014) 160-170 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.02.107

A. Calmet, N. Vejar, X. Gonzalez, M. Sancy, A. Ringuede, V. Lair, S. Griveau, J. H. Zagal, F. Bedioui, M. Cassir, Electroanalysis 30 (2016) 162-169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201700464

B. R. Strohmeier, Surface and Interface Analysis 15 (1990) 51-56 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sia.740150109

J. Lu, W. Sun, A. Becker, Journal of Mechanical Sciences 105 (2016) 315-329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2015.11.024

L. Veleva, M. A. Alpuche-Aviles, M. K. Graves-Brook, D. O. Wipf, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 537 (2002) 85-93 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(02)01253-6

S. Tang, O. J. Kwon, N. Lu, H. S. Choi, Surface and Coatings Technology 195 (2005) 298-306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.071

K. Brunelli, S. Gottardello, E. Napolitani, B. Dal Bianco, R. Bertocello, M. Magrini, M. Dabalà , Materials Chemistry and Physics 136 (2012) 1073-1080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.08.053

J. Pellier, J. Geringer, B. Forest, Wear 271 (2011) 1563-1571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2011.01.082

L. Freire, M. J. Carmezim, M. al Ferreira, M. F. Montemor, Electrochimica Acta 55 (2010) 6174-6181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.10.026

C. Compere, N. Le Bozec, Proceeding of the First Stainless Steel Congress in Thailand, Thailand, 159 (1997) in EFC Working Party Report on 'Microbially Induced Corrosion’

I. Costa, C. V. Franco, C. T. Kunioshi, J. L. Rossi, Corrosion 62 (2006) 357-365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3280667

M. A. Baker, J. E. Castle, Corrosion Science 34 (1993) 667-682 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-938X(93)90279-P

P. Schmuki, H. Hildebrand, A. Friedrich, S. Virtanen, Corrosion Science 47 (2005) 1239-1250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.023

Downloads

Published

28-02-2019

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2019)

Section

Electrochemical Science

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Effect of immersion time at the stainless steel 304L/NaCl (0.01 M) interface. (2019). Journal of Electrochemical Science and Engineering, 9(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.5599/jese.639